Advertisement
FeaturesInternational

John Magufuli: Man of work, people

Advertisement
MAN OF THE PEOPLE— Magufuli

The late Tanzanian president John Magufuli was in his element on February 24 while unveiling a massive road project in Dar es Salaam, an accomplishment he boasted could only be achieved by the governing Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM— or Party of the Revolution’).

“It was completed on time because no-one used coronavirus as an excuse to delay it,” he said, while applauding the contractors and also instructing government officials not to entertain anyone using the pandemic as an excuse to postpone the delivery of projects.

This one was no different to previous public functions – a choir serenaded him, and he ended it with a characteristic speech extolling his mantra of Hapa Kazi Tu (Work is My Only Focus).

Advertisement

“Tanzania is a rich country; we have to use our wealth in order to develop,” he said in his remarks, which also chastised tardiness and exhorted Tanzanians to pay their taxes.

Three days later, Magufuli would be seen in public for the last time.

Since his first election in 2015, Magufuli cultivated the image of an rambunctious action man, a departure from his predecessors’ demure and stately style.

Advertisement

His interventionist— supporters called it “hands-on” — leadership style won him fans beyond Tanzania, especially in the East African region, where he inspired the #WhatWouldMagufuliDo Twitter hashtag, praising his no-nonsense approach to fighting corruption and tirelessly following up infrastructure projects to ensure they are completed.

What most Tanzanians cared about, his fans argued, was service delivery and Magufuli’s populist governing style was effective and a model for other African leaders.

A man of the people

His supporters will miss the hours-long road trips he embarked on across the country, which involved multiple stops so he could speak with the public.

These trips, which unnerved government officials, were often broadcast live on television and became popular with some Tanzanians, who saw them as an opportunity to get instant redress to their problems.

Crowds of people often gathered and shuffled around the presidential convoy on close watch of the heavily armed bodyguards.

Those who were determined got a chance to ask him questions, but most people used the opportunity to plead with the president to intervene on myriad issues such as fixing delayed road projects, never-ending court cases, complaints about water supply or grievances against local officials.

Standing out of the sunroof of his armoured vehicle, with a microphone in hand, Magufuli listened and sometimes asked follow-up questions. His responses were mixed but, by the time he was done, a new policy would have been proclaimed, an official either sacked or promoted, or the person who asked the question humiliated.

He once berated a man in a Dar es Salaam neighbourhood who had complained that it was expensive to use public toilets: “Then leave your faeces at home,” he answered back, to great amusement and consternation.

Political opponents, neighbouring countries, mining firms, Western nations and anyone he viewed as undermining Tanzanian interests were also targets of his abrasive governing style.

Critics said he was an autocrat with thin skin, a man obsessed with building a personality cult and who did not entertain any slights or jests whether from musicians, comedians or commentators on social media.

He instilled such fear in the country that even during his more than two-week absence from public life, his draconian policies continued unabated – police arrested those who speculated about the president’s whereabouts or asked simply: Where is Magufuli?

This state of affairs is something of a contradiction to his casting himself as a defender of the dignity of Tanzanians.

He also muzzled Tanzanian news media, shutting down several newspapers, radio and television stations as well as social media platforms simply for reporting what the government did not like.

He was also criticised for implementing policies such as banning girls who got pregnant from going to school.

But it was his handling of the coronavirus pandemic that was arguably his most damning failure.

In his latter days, he hectored critics who did not buy his narrative about the country being “Covid-free” – a stance which was surprisingly in contrast to his sober, science-led approach during the early days of the pandemic.

Magufuli, a former chemistry teacher, would later push conspiracies about plots to harm Tanzanians while expressing doubt about the safety of facemasks and vaccines.

At one point, he sent papaya and goat meat samples to be tested for coronavirus and used the results to justify his denial of the virus.

The true cost of this negligence and dereliction of duty can be counted in the number of lives lost as a result.

Strongmen or strong institutions

There will be vigorous debate in Tanzania about Magufuli’s legacy and whether his successor should stay the course or change.

This debate cannot be divorced from the divide about whether the continent needs strongmen/women or strong institutions.

Magufuli appealed to many because he was unencumbered by institutional limits. He issued edicts and things happened and, to many citizens who had grown frustrated by incompetence in government, this was refreshing.

It is an irony that the pandemic he strenuously denied has outlasted him, turning his once-heralded presidency into a cautionary tale for the region and the continent. —BBC

Advertisement
Tags
Show More
Advertisement

Related Articles

Back to top button
Close
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker