Advertisement
Columns

Unbiased synergy

Advertisement

With Lorraine Lusinje:

Travelling in rural areas and interacting with rural communities gives one an opportunity to see life from the other side. As much as urban and rural worlds are totally different, they have one mutual underlying fact: both worlds have people who are frantically trying to survive under their present circumstances.

The funny thing is that both worlds usually run on unfounded assumptions about the other. For instance, most rural people assume that life in the urban world is simple and that money is always available. A person from the rural area finds it hard to believe when a relative living in town tells them they are broke or they cannot afford something. A very naive and wrongly placed assumption it is, but that is mostly the case.

Advertisement

On the other hand, urban people usually believe that the people in the village do not have a life and the best life would be for them to come into town or to emulate the modern lifestyle. They run under the assumption that the rural population is an easily impressionable lot with no long-term goals. Do we stop to consider that some of the people in the village are content just the way they are? Do we stop to consider that what we consider poor standards of living is what they consider peace of mind? Sometimes we impose our values and beliefs on others.

Many a time, urban people develop a super condescending and arrogant complex which makes them believe that they are superior to the people in the village and live better lives. In some instances, the arrogance is masked as assistance. We, at times, preach about wanting to help the rural population when really what we are trying to achieve is control and superiority. When we want to help, let us learn to help people within their realms of comfort and not overstretch others to meet our standards. That moves from assistance to manipulation. It migrates from helping to stroking egos.

For politicians, it is more evident that the rural population is considered a means to an end and not a vital tool in an ongoing mission. Before election time, politicians will cosy up to their rural constituencies and wax lyrical about fulfilling their hopes and dreams of development and a sustainable future. The ‘well-meaning’ politicians do and say all the right things until they are on the throne. This is when their true arrogant colours come to light as they turn around and treat the very people who put them into power like peasants who have no say.

Advertisement

However, what I have come to appreciate is that the rural population is a serious development partner. A large force of the country is in the rural area. This should tell us that, if we are to achieve any meaningful change and if we are to forge ahead, the rural population has to be part and parcel of the decision-making process. Do we allow ourselves to engage and listen to ‘the other side’ or we constantly make decisions on their behalf? How many standards have we imposed?

I believe the rural force is an even more determined force than the urban force. If the rural force were to protest against injustices, the whole village would be there. If it was up to the rural force, underperforming figures of authority would have been ousted swiftly and quickly. This is because the people are passionate about survival. They do not have social media platforms to make impressions on; for them, every day is a new day to fight and survive. Every issue is a real issue to confront.

Urban or rural, we are all Malawian and moving forward calls for unbiased synergy.

I rest my case.

Facebook Notice for EU! You need to login to view and post FB Comments!
Advertisement
Tags
Show More
Advertisement

Related Articles

Check Also

Close
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker