By Patience Munyenyembe:
Every Malawian child is born into obligations they never chose. Before they speak their first word, a share of their future has already been signed away by people they have never met, under terms they will never be shown.
There is a performance we have all watched so many times it no longer registers as theatre. A government official stands at a podium beside a foreign dignitary or a smiling corporate executive. An agreement has been signed. Money is coming. Cameras flash. The official speaks of partnership, of development, of a brighter future for the Malawian people yet nobody mentions what was agreed in return. Nobody mentions who will pay and that question (the only question that actually matters) is left for us the citizens to discover slowly, quietly, and usually too late.
Fellow Malawians, the truth that our leaders have never had the courage to state plainly is this: there is no such thing as unconditional aid. Not from the West. Not from China. Not from the well-connected businessman who donated a classroom block to your community school. Aid is always a transaction. The conditions are sometimes written in formal contracts, sometimes embedded in political obligation, sometimes enforced through social pressure so normalised we no longer recognise it as pressure at all. But the conditions are always there and the people who set them are never the ones who end up living with them.
- Advertisement -
The international lenders are the most familiar players in this story. When the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or World Bank extend financing to Malawi, the money arrives wrapped in requirements stating how we manage our exchange rate, how we price fuel and electricity, how much we pay our teachers and nurses, which state enterprises we must sell off.
- Advertisement -
These are not suggestions. They are the price of the loan decided in Washington by institutions in which Malawi holds a fraction of a fraction of the voting power. The Kwacha devaluation of 2023 which stripped the purchasing power of millions of Malawians overnight was a condition of continued IMF support. It was announced. It was not explained and there is a difference.
Then there is China, which has built its entire lending identity on a single, attractive promise: “No political strings attached”.
After decades of Western conditionality, that promise has been welcomed across Africa with open arms. But in 2021, researchers from four independent institutions analysed 100 Chinese government loan contracts and found something that every African citizen deserves to know. Every single contract from China’s Development Bank contained confidentiality clauses barring the borrowing government from revealing the loan terms or even the existence of the debt to its own public.
The contracts also require Chinese lenders to be repaid before all other creditors if a country defaults, and contain clauses preventing the debt from being restructured in a crisis. No strings, China says, but in truth the strings are simply invisible — and invisible strings, as any Malawian who has ever taken an informal loan will tell you, are the most dangerous kind.
- Advertisement -
But if you ask me, the form of conditional aid that hits closest and is spoken about least is not foreign at all. It lives among us. Across Malawi influential business people and corporations regularly fund schools, boreholes, church buildings and community projects. These contributions arrive with ceremony and are received with gratitude.
Rarely are they received with the question they deserve: What do you want in return? Because there is always a return. The business that drills a borehole in a community where it operates is ultimately purchasing social licence, which is more like an informal permission to continue operating without resistance. The tycoon whose name is on the government school building is cultivating the goodwill that protects his/her government contracts.
These are not acts of generosity with conditions discreetly attached, no. These are entirely investments dressed as generosity and the community has no idea what it has agreed to until the moment it is expected to agree to something. The politician who arrives with iron sheets and fertiliser before an election is working from the same logic. In this context, the condition is your vote, your silence, your continued willingness to call it leadership when it is, in fact, a transaction.
What connects every player in this story i.e. the IMF, the Chinese state bank, the corporate donor, the politician with a constituency ambulance is one mechanism. Each offers something a powerless party genuinely needs at a price never disclosed upfront, enforced through means the recipient cannot easily refuse. The scale differs. The contracts differ. But the logic is identical–– power sets the terms and the powerless absorb the cost.
My people, we have accepted this arrangement for so long that we have mistaken it for the natural order of things. It is not. It is simply a system designed by those with power, sustained by the silence of those without it, and profitable for everyone except the people it claims to serve.
The child born in Malawi today will grow up repaying debts she/he never incurred under agreements she/he was never shown, negotiated by officials who faced no consequences for what they signed. These children will be told, as we were told, that this is development. They will be expected, as we were expected, to be grateful but I urge them to be furious and so should we!
We know who sits at these tables. We know who signs. We know who benefits. What we have collectively chosen for far too long is not to say so out loud. And so, every time we applaud a loan announcement without asking what it costs, every time we accept iron sheets without asking what they buy, every time we receive a donation without asking what it demands, we are not being grateful. We are simply being managed.
That ends when we decide it ends. That ends when we, the patriotic citizens of this country, relentlessly start demanding the terms, read the contracts and ask those questions that our leaders have spent decades hoping we would not think to ask. Why? Because in my two pence view, the most powerful thing an ordinary Malawian can do is refuse to be the last to know what was agreed in their name. I beg to move.
